NEW YORK HERALD TRIBUNE BOOK REVIEW
31 December 1961
PAUL'S TALE II
by Anne Ross
Raymond DeCapite has once again chosen to write about an Italian-American
family in Ohio, as he did in his charming first book, "The
Coming of Fabrizze." "A Lost King," however,
is a highly personal story of Paul Christopher, a boy unable
to adjust to the pressures of modern living, whose relationship
with a sick, embittered father are endangered by this failure.
Although told with a vivid gaiety, it is, incongruously, a
sad novel. Paul’s mother died when he was young, and
undoubtedly her death warped his father’s life. Paul
was accustomed to having his mother come to him in the night
when he coughed, and rubbing his chest. After her death he
went on coughing as if that would bring her back. His sister
Nina rubbed his chest, but it was not the same. Finally his
father said: "I just made a rule against coughing in the
house at night. I’m sick of it, and so I made a rule
against it." My father was worse than medicine," Paul
comments.
His father blasted with fury and sarcasm young Nina’s
attempts to take over her mother’s duties. So when she
met a charming young insurance salesman she was only too willing
to marry him and leave her angry home. Paul and his father
lived alone afterwards, in a disorder which Paul accepted cheerfully
and which his father seemed to ignore. By the time his father
became crippled by arthritis and bursitis, and was forced to
stop work, Paul had graduated from high school. He took various
jobs in his desperate attempts to win the old man’s affection.
Each job terminated with some terrible disaster. Each failure
aggravated his father still further though Paul tried frantically
to appease him with cakes, wine, a song on the harmonica, or
perversely by teasing him. Finally their relationship reached
a climax which revealed father and son to each other with a
bitter-sweet finality.
Raymond DeCapite has a delightful and distinctive style, and
it would be wrong to compare him with other genre writers such
as Saroyan or Papashvily, simply because he writes about an
immigrant family. His greatest quality is his ability to achieve
tenderness without sentimentality. He tells a story in which
the characters strive to communicate and cannot: yet they are
not dull incoherent people, they are frequently extremely funny--sardonically
and exasperatingly so, for behind their wit is the ache of
unexpressed love.
< Back to reviews